MENU
Subtotal: $0.00 Cart
  • the source of our inspiration




    premium, archival fine art inkjet papers wrapped in the intimacy of a rural culture

  • juniper baryta rag


    our best reviewed and most award-winning paper yet

  • MOAB MASTERS

    Photo: Andy Biggs

    "All my portfolios are printed on Entrada. It's necessary that each print stands alone as a piece of art, and it's because of Entrada's weight and feel that my portfolio stands out from the rest."

Archive
Twitter

Moab Support Forum > Cold Press Profile Question - Using M3

Hi, I think I figured out some print rending issues I was having before I started building my own printer profiles, and want to verify it with you and hopefully get a perspective.

For Entrada Cold Press, it looks like the Epson P900 profile Moab supplies is based on an M3 viewing condition….is that correct?

And if I got that right, and it’s not too much to ask, why use M3, and not say M0/1/2? Just trying to understand the reasoning.

Thanks in advance!!

December 20, 2023 | Unregistered CommenterHank Roark

You are correct- the Entrada Coldpress profile for the P900 does use polarized/M3 data. We generally use polarized measurement on textured cotton papers, for a few reasons: it creates better separation in the shadow/quarter tones, a gray closer to neutral, and better color accuracy.
The trade-off, as you mentioned, is that a soft proof may display more shadow detail than is available in the physical print, as the polarized device produces a max black around L* 3 or 4, and we see a max black around L* 12.
We decided the potential benefits of M3 profiles on these specific papers was worth the trade-off.

December 21, 2023 | Unregistered CommenterMoab Paper Support